Twitter LinkedIn Google+
WP Greet Box icon

Welcome back, visitor!. You might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for online marketing info as Todd posts it.

Switch Reading StyleNighttimeDaytime

Search Engine Optimization Warfare – The Competitive Webmaster’s Guide to Understanding the Dynamics of Top Rankings

Online marketing information can change quickly This article is 7 years and 70 days old, and the facts and opinions contained in it may be out of date.

SEO TrainingSearch engine optimization is misunderstood and despised by those who have had consistently failed at using it, or have been repeatedly beaten by those who were successful with it. These failures often stem from not understanding the dynamics of the behind the scenes battles that go on for search positioning. It is also a shame to see bright new folks not understanding the field in which they work. It is one thing to be ambitious and competitive – it is quite another to be outright delusional about what you can accomplish. Success is often created by knowing where to start, and how to scale, and which battles will be lost before they are ever fought. A smart general (or SEO) never fights a battle unless they KNOW they can win. This post is intended to be a guide to understanding the fight that takes place for every single search result, and how to know which battles have acceptable odds based on the competition.

Organic search results ARE NOT "free traffic". It is paid for in a much different way, with calculated risks and rewards. You WILL NEVER rank for the single term "mortgages". In fact, I give you very poor odds for every ranking for "Ohio mortgages" unless you are quite proficient at understanding competitive analysis and the playbook for SEO, and executing on the important elements of top rankings.

"There is no such thing as a good marketing strategy in the abstract. Good strategy is bad. And bad strategy is good. It all depends on who is going to use it." – Marketing Warfare

SEO can easily be substituted for "marketing strategy". There is no one size fits all solution to a good SEO campaign. Understanding the nature and intensity of the competition is as important as being able to compete for the top spots (Didn’t your mother ever tell you, "you have to pick your battles?) The intensity of the battle will be determined by the other players within the vertical space, and governed by the tactics deemed acceptable and overly aggressive within that marketplace (you’re not gonna rank for "mortgages" without buying some links).

Top rankings will always consist of 3 main points – The old stand bys (content, its’ structure, and inbound links), and one that is being somewhat overlooked as it creeps its way into the search algorithms (legitimate users’ clickstream data that verify the quality and integrity of a website through their actions). These are the goals of any SEO campaign. The methodology for obtaining these goals will never be the same, which is why it takes a creative mind to develop the strategy and understand the tools available to do so.

Concepts of Search Engine Optimization Warfare

1. The principle of force
"SEO is knowing what the search engines want and giving it to them… so hard they f*cking bleed"
quote from DaveN
Aggressive tactics will always win. The main question is how long they will be successful (the risk associated with them). Thinking that a site will outrank others because it is better in terms of content, design, and usability is a mistake made by naive webmasters that have not yet figured out the competitive nature of search results, and their true value. These webmasters overpromise on results due to their inexperience, and this naivete then borders on negligence.

Search results prove over and over that the best sites are not always the top ranked sites. The BEST product, service, or website is NOT always in the top spot of Google. (Perhaps the data borg will someday change this) While we’d like to believe that relevance will be perfect, archaic aggressive tactics can constantly be found at the top of search results, and tend to maintain those high positions for extended periods of time until there is some type of human intervention (in the form of spam reports). This is not a knock on the ever increasing improvements of relevance, but only a caveat to those believing that these tactics will never again be effective, and drink the koolaid that these tactics have been remedied by solely algorithmic means.

defensible SEO2. The superiority of defense –
"Domain names may play a big roll not only in anchor text, but also in overall domain credibility, linkability, and defensibility." – Aaron Wall

Defensible traffic is a concept that will not go away in the world of search engine optimization, and why we will see the love affair between domainers and SEO’s continue to grow. When you’re doing lead generation like a profitable company like Quinstreet, you need to be able to have a thick site that will defend your rankings. A quality branded keyword domain will always be a defensible asset. No matter how algorithms shift, a keyword in the domain will always be effective to varying degrees. A site with thousands of quality inbounds links, or a loyal userbase will always be a defensible asset as well.

Buying a competitor has always been the quickest way to oust a competitor, and this is becoming increasingly true in search results. Even if you are number one on every major term, the other five sites that are consistently in the top ten represent a significant threat to that’s site marketshare (especially if they are truly defensible). Being able to defend with "checkbook SEO" will become increasingly prevalent, and make challenging for top money terms with new sites even more of an impossibility.

3. The new era of competition –
"I just hired a billion linkbuilders and I am not paying them a single cent!" –
Brian Provost
Social media being highly effective for developing global link popularity is only one shining example of the battleground being shifted. Emerging tools and technology will shift the battlegrounds even further. Those who understand the strengths, weaknesses, and applications of these tools are the new era of competition within the industries that they affect.

  • The nature of the battleground
    The battleground for search engine optimization is top search engine rankings. The stakes for successfully claiming the grounds can be substantial.

    The strategic squareFour types of warfare:
    Offensive, Defensive, Flanking, and Guerrilla

    Principles of defensive warfare

    1. Those in the top spots should play defense by constantly repeating the things that got them to the top within the acceptable rules.
    2. The best defensive strategy is to try to outrank your own sites with other sites.
  • Strong competitive tactics should always be emulated with improvement or bought.

    Principles of offensive warfare

    1. The main consideration is the strength of the leader’s position with regards to historical data, user base, linkage, and content.
    2. The point of attack should be any angle that the leader is not leveraging – their strengths can be emulated and improved upon once they are in your sites
  • Choose a niche in as narrow a topic as possible to build the site in terms of cashflow for future growth.

    Principles of flanking warfare
    Guerrilla SEO

    1. A good flanking move must be made into a niche that has not been discovered or exploited by the market leader.
    2. Your site should not be discovered until it is a defensible position within the niche.
    3. Learning from the process of high ranking is as important as achieving the top position itself.

    Principles of guerrilla warfare
    1. Find a search result small enough to make it defensible.

  • No matter how defensible the site in your specified niche becomes, don’t act like the leader of the vertical
    Example: When you become number one for "engineering jobs" don’t start emulating monster.com
  • Understand when it is time to move to the next niche, and when opportunity cost outweighs the marginal value for growth. Know when to quit.

    The search result wars

    SEO results

    Within any search results, there are war stories. Most of these battles are never heard about, seen, or understood, but the understanding of them, and experience in them for those that do is invaluable. These stories and experience are the basis for the future direction of search marketing strategy within many companies, and are shared over IM, and at conferences between those who have built rapports of trust much stronger than any NDA. Some of the more generalized stories, or less important stories come to light after the first few beers at a search conference. Many of the most competitive webmasters have become veterans to certain industries that thrive based off of their search results, and share stories of joy and distress based on the strategic direction decisions made long before the algorithm updates that can make or break revenues for months at a time. To hear your first SEO war story just ask anyone who was around for it how their site was affected by the "Florida update". Then ask them about it’s impact both before and after on their entire marketplace. Welcome to the battlegrounds – please don’t enter until you arm yourself with tools and knowledge.

    Credits and thanks.

    This post was based around the concepts presented in the book Marketing Warfare which is an excellent read for anyone in the field, and among my favorite books. A big thank you to Mikkel as well, for mentioning it was one of his favorites.

    More information about Todd Malicoat aka stuntdubl.

    Twitter LinkedIn Google+ 

    • Pingback: Search Engine Land: News About Search Engines & Search Marketing

    • Pingback: SEO’s + Domainers = Internet Superfriends? | Scoreboard Media Group

    • http://www.linkedin.com/in/lucasng shor

      Brilliant. That DaveN quote is priceless.

      Inexperienced search marketers might win a battle here and there, but professionals win wars.

      Have also just ordered the Reis/Trout book. Thanks for the book tip! Going to take advantage of the strong $AUD at every opportunity ;)

    • Pingback: Friday Night Link-o-rama » Small Business SEM

    • http://www.terryreeves.com Nashville SEO

      Excellent piece. This post is a must read for anyone who thinks they should seo.

      Thanks.

    • Pingback: This Week In SEO - 5/18/07 - TheVanBlog

    • http://www.laptopbatterybbs.com/ Aspire

      Whatever the fields, war is always there(including search engine). For newbie it was a very good experience and learning opportunities.

    • http://www.britishchap.com SEO Charlotte

      Whatever business you are running there will be marketing warfare..

    • http://seobloguk.blogspot.com Lisa Ditlefsen

      This is a fantastic post Todd. Really enjoyed the read and agree with you on most points ;)Are you coming to SMX Seattle? Would love to meet you.

    • http://www.stuntdubl.com Stuntdubl SEO

      Hey Lisa – yep, I’ll be there. Should be fun.

    • http://www.youshouldknow.com -=LaCabra=-

      Excellent post Todd!! Great way to put things!
      cheers.

    • http://www.shaunanderson.co.uk Shaun

      “f*cking” Brilliant post.

    • http://www.demib.com Mikkel deMib Svendsen

      Thanks for the credit. Yes, I love “Marketing Warfare” – it has become a “bible” to me. In fact, today I devide all marketing people in the world into two categories: The ones that have read (and understood!) this book and the ones that haven’t. I most often chose not to work with the last group!

      However, I think you missed one point from the book that have played a huge role for me in strategy work: “Find the weakness in your competitors strenght!” In other words, what is it that, because of your competitors strength, makes them weak (in search)?

      One good example of this is a antivirus company I used to work for. They are a small company compared to the large public antivirus majors. When analyzing the market space we found out that NONE of the large antivirus companies had the balls to run an open community – a forum. Public US companies, in general, don’t do that. Its the size of their brand and the fact that they are publically traded, that limits them (OK, and a bunch of studpid lawyers). The weakness in their strength is that they can’t do a community. We could! And within a few month the forum we created attracted up to 500,000 organic search visitors a month on approx 40,000 unique (and very relevant) phrases!

    • http://yahoo.com Bill Compton

      Hi Jim. Photos i received. Thanks

    • Pingback: A Few Good Posts

    • http://www.phsdl.net Igor Berger

      SEO Wars are real, and they are nasty, very nasty.

      Some SEO’s from Google Webmaster Help Forum are so evil that they are going around contacting all the Websites that link to my business Website and asking them to remove our link and saying really nasty things about our company.

      Our company has been around for over 12 years serving a niche regional market and we have a very good reputation with our customers. So being that the punks could not trash our company name they are going after our authoritative status in search engines. Their strategy is to delink our Website from any authoritative Websites reducing our Page Rank status.

      I wonder if this assault has anything to do with my statements against Google and how Google treats Webmasters?

      Do Google employees like Adam Lasnik and Matt Cutts have anything to do with this?
      I was banned from GWHF by Adam Lasnik for making recommendation on not to use rel=”nofollow” and to take out the supplementary pages with disallow robots.txt and noindex meta tag. By removing the supplementary pages the Website becomes stronger.

      I am not saying anything that professional Webmasters already do not know. Go to Webmasterworld.com or Seomoz.org and you will be told the same thing about supplementary and rel=”nofollow” as I say.

      Matt C. is a nice guy but today he caved in to peer pressure and deleted over 200 of my comments of his blog.

      What’s next?

      I like and respect how DaveN challenges Google search engine theories and statements even when Adam L. or Matt C. swear by them.

      Anyway, SEO Wars, Ney, it is more like World War III

    • http://www.phsdl.net Igor Berger

      Nice to see you have balls and not afraid of big bad Google…

      Hey Todd from Albany, I am a Brooklyn boy myself but now in Japan..

    • Pingback: 4 Useful Lessons from the Meteoric Rise of eBizMBA.com — Tropical SEO

    • Pingback: Flip That Site: Make Money Online Buying and Selling Websites — Jason Hendricks

    • Pingback: 10 Must Read SEO Articles | MyWebtronics.com

    • Pingback: 10 Must Read SEO Articles | MyWebTronics

    Buffer