SEO Contradictions Part II
Thanks to Dean for originally pointing out the source of all our SEO confusion
- All links work vs. Contextual links work
- Buy links for click through (or don’t buy them) vs. Buy links for search rankings
- There’s nothing a competitor can do to hurt your site vs. Googlebowling
- SEO is dead vs. Long live SEO
- Directory links are important vs. Google hates directory links
- All penalties are algorithmic vs. Lots of hand edits
- Sandbox vs. There is no sandbox
- Filters vs. Penalties
- The blue pill vs. There is no spoon
- Pagerank is dead vs. Buy links based on Pagerank (okay this one is just plain WRONG)
- Content remix vs. Scraper sites
- Blogs rank too well vs. SE’s don’t like blogs
- Real simple syndication vs. Real simple stealing
- Lots of links vs. Quality links
- Google knows all vs. Google is dumb
- Lots of diretories vs. Good directories
- Automated vs. Manual
- Linking in vs. Linking Out
- Global vs. Local
- Google is good vs. Google is evil
In: Bashing an improved MSN.
Out: Bashing Google
Boring: New Yahoo products.
Added: It’s worth noting that the answers to these contradictions most often exists somewhere between the two, and that is just a testament to the fact that nothing in SEO/SEM is cut and dry, black and white. It’s all shades of #CCCCCC
Tags: SEO, Search Engine Optimization





Leave a Reply